Shotlingo vs ButterKit
ButterKit is the native-Mac choice for Apple-only teams that live in Xcode. Shotlingo is the web-first choice for everyone — including Windows, Linux, iPad, and any team shipping to Google Play alongside the App Store.
Competitor: ButterKit · Native macOS app with Metal 3D rendering, Xcode Simulator capture, and Claude/Cursor MCP automation.
Pick Shotlingo if…
- • You ship to both App Store and Google Play (ButterKit is App Store only from a Mac).
- • Your team is on Windows, Linux, or works from a browser.
- • You want a canvas that opens on a phone or an iPad, not only a macOS 26+ Apple Silicon Mac.
- • You need translation memory shared across projects and teammates.
Pick ButterKit if…
- • Everyone on the team runs macOS 26+ on Apple Silicon and lives in Xcode.
- • You want to capture straight from the iOS Simulator with zero drag-and-drop.
- • You already script your release flow (Fastlane, Xcode Cloud) and want screenshots in the same script.
- • You want to drive screenshot generation from Claude Code / Cursor via ButterKit’s MCP server.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Shotlingo | ButterKit |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | Web (any OS, any device) | macOS 26+, Apple Silicon recommended |
| App Store + Google Play support ButterKit does not export Google Play sizes. | ✓ | App Store only |
| Xcode Simulator direct capture ButterKit's core differentiator. | ✗ | ✓ |
| Auto-translate captions | 40+ languages | 50 App Store languages |
| RTL layout mirroring (Arabic, Hebrew) | ✓ | Text supported; full mirror unknown |
| Translation memory across projects | ✓ | Unknown |
| 3D device mockups | 469 mockups (Fabric.js canvas) | Real-time Metal, up to 120fps |
| Direct upload to App Store Connect | ✓ | ✓ |
| Direct upload to Google Play Console | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCP server for Claude / Cursor / Codex You can script ButterKit end-to-end from an AI coding agent — genuinely unique. | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fastlane integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Runs entirely on device (no cloud) | ✗ | ✓ |
| One-time purchase option | ✗ | $99 lifetime |
| Free plan | Free tier, no watermark | Free with watermark |
Pricing
Shotlingo
- Free: $0
- Pro: $9 / mo
- Plus: $19 / mo
- Studio: $39 / mo
ButterKit
- Subscription: $39 / year
- One-time: $99 (Perpetual license.)
Where ButterKit genuinely wins
If everyone on your team runs macOS 26+ on Apple Silicon and ships only to the App Store, ButterKit is genuinely a better tool. Capturing straight from the Xcode Simulator, driving the flow from Claude Code via MCP, and paying $99 once is a real workflow win no web tool can match. We beat them on cross-platform (Windows/Linux/browser), Google Play, and no-OS-lock-in.
FAQ
Which is cheaper over 3 years?
ButterKit at the one-time $99 is cheaper than any subscription over 2+ years if the tool keeps up with your OS. Shotlingo Pro is $9/mo ($108/yr) or $19 Plus. If you only ship to App Store from macOS, ButterKit's lifetime plan wins on total cost.
Can ButterKit generate Google Play screenshots?
No. ButterKit exports App Store sizes only. If you ship to both stores, Shotlingo emits every Play Console + App Store Connect size from one project, with the locale-code mapping (zh-CN vs zh-Hans, iw vs he) already handled.
Does Shotlingo have anything like ButterKit's MCP server?
Yes — Shotlingo publishes its own MCP server at /mcp for AI agents to read templates, render screenshots, and query app data. ButterKit's MCP is deeper on the render side because it runs a full macOS renderer locally; ours is deeper on the multi-store, multi-language side. Different strengths.
What if my team is half on Windows?
ButterKit will not run for the Windows half. Shotlingo is browser-based, so the same project file opens the same on Windows, macOS, Linux, or an iPad browser. This is the single most common reason teams pick us over ButterKit.
Try Shotlingo for your App Store screenshots
Free to start. Device mockups, 40+ languages, App Store Connect export sizes.
Try Shotlingo free →